h/t Nick Gold

https://archive.org/details/a-2023-01298/mode/2up?view=theater

Thanks to u/AtreonZ's request that led to the new batch of Feb. '23 UAP shoot-down docs from Canada, and u/dsotis' work securing the related memo to Trudeau  it appears to be confirmed that UAP 20 was Dead Horse, Alaska.

Which they recovered, according to the memo! It was a metallic floating object, and a ground station (?) seems to have switched over to diesel backups on orders, prior to the engagement of the UAP.

Say what?!

Check out the logs relating to the operation.

And MAJOR H/T to u/AtreonZ and @dsotis for securing the docs that confirm we were lied to, and the Dead Horse/Prudhoe Bay UAP was recovered.

Why was the American public told none of the three UAP shot down between Feb 10 and Feb 12, 2023 were recovered, when it's now been proven via Canadian documents that UAP 20 was the Deadhorse/Prudhoe Bay Alaska object, and it was recovered and had begun an exploitation process?

What did the exploitation process reveal about UAP 20, described in mission logs as a metallic floating object that the public was told was not a balloon by General VanHerck of NORAD, who ran the shoot-down operation? "We're calling them objects for a reason."

When asked by Helene Cooper of NYT on the Feb 12 mid-Super Bowl press conference about the UAP shoot-downs if any of these objects were extraterrestrial, VanHerck said he couldn't take anything off the table until they were recovered. What did the recovery and exploitation of UAP 20 reveal about its nature and origin?

What required its primary power to be switched over to diesel backups during the #UAP engagement, and why, as referenced in the declassified logs?

Is it true, as CNN reported at the time, that UAP 20 caused interference with aircraft systems? Did its exploitation reveal how it may have accomplished this, if indeed it did occur?

Please share if so inclined!

by wrexxxxxxx

1 Comment

Leave A Reply