I find the language used very interesting here. They seem to represent the law(accurately) as something good for accountability and throws this ball over to the house to put this forward for congress on a whole since senate failed to put it forward.
I do find it interesting this democratic senator emphasized it was a republican led ammendment this go around.
by Sure_Source_2833
2 Comments
This seems relevant to the upcoming hearings showcasing the mindset of many representatives and senators.
Key parts to focus on is the positive description of the uapda from a democratic representative while emphasizing Mike Rounds involvement.
It also reinforces the idea that the house pushing the uapda combined with outreach could influence its odds of being included still in the fy2025 NDAA.
It ultimately is a bipartisan push with certain individuals that have been key to blocking multiple bills that would have benefited the people as a whole -cough”bitchmconnel”cough-