This post on twitter today got me thinking (https://x.com/blackvaultcom/status/1845956749012226425), they demand the government disclose the information about aliens/uap/etc. However, many of them have details, documents, pictures/videos, etc that they claim are really damning.
Some claim they don't want to risk "catastrophic disclosure", but somehow if the government does it, it won't be? Ignoring the "if I die it will be released" angle mentioned in the tweet, isn't it pretty hypocritical to say "you should release something" while refusing to release their own?
Personally, I think so. They might say something like "well I was given this info because the sources will trust me not to release it" or whatever, what use is it to tease the public about it? Not being open and transparent really makes it seem they are being used to manipulate the public and the community that demands answers from the intelligence community.
I am a firm believer that those who say "Lou/Grush/etc are disinformation agents, they even worked in counter-intel!" is not the right way to think about it. How do you expect to get secrets from a small group of people, except someone from that group?
Anyways, I just wanted to call out the hypocrisy.
by -spartacus-