Trying this again as my post from earlier was taken down. Fortunately, I came across some supposed pics of the craft shot down over Yukon since then!

WE'RE HERE, FOLKS! WE HAVE AN ADMISSION OF A MODERN-DAY UFO SHOOTDOWN!

Credit to DM_Pelley on Twitter for supposed pics of the actual craft:

https://preview.redd.it/bamfyu399wqd1.jpg?width=655&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b02ea778e6d9ef8791261cf3cd1d10dade8f5353

https://preview.redd.it/3k5o2v399wqd1.jpg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f4078c189d640a7bec8f3dbd9143ee0702bda7d5

https://preview.redd.it/4lwkpv399wqd1.jpg?width=943&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e99a8f7a8ef924f097894a0e2143211aa54111ac

With the Alaska shootdown story blowing open following the release of an image of the craft shot down over the Yukon in February 2023:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/image-released-of-mysterious-object-shot-down-over-yukon-in-2023-1.7049241

Here's a compilation of footage via Nick Gold on Twitter of the crash retrieval:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtL23O0klc4&t=1s

Remember that there were statements made that the craft was jamming the fighter jet's system. Looks like perhaps there was jamming at the base as well.

I know somebody who was working in that area and is affiliated with the Air Force who was told that something making wild maneuvers was being picked up on radar at the time.

Earlier today, Ross Coulthart tweeted out a statement made on LinkedIn by Geoff Cruikshank, aka u/harry_is_white_hot, who was way ahead of us in digging in and timelining a lot of the UFO/UAP narrative.

https://x.com/rosscoulthart/status/1838700353027789125

https://preview.redd.it/rx3c2xys9wqd1.png?width=1196&format=png&auto=webp&s=d257ac3a218e1ad5dd6de993c3743f032aca94b3

https://preview.redd.it/920f4yys9wqd1.png?width=1204&format=png&auto=webp&s=2fb4c8696688f4d35b301a653f63d9c0c88be30a

"Curious that u/dsotis' FOIA'ed image of the 'Pac-Man' #UAP purportedly shot down in Feb 2023 over the Yukon doesn't look anything like a balloon. And, as Geoff Cruikshank details here, theu/NORADCommandpilot saw a 'metallic airborne floating object':

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/geoff-cruickshank_10-feb-2023-uap-shootdown-log-alaska-activity-7244313441648181250-CZHX/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

https://preview.redd.it/kprvkqev9wqd1.png?width=1158&format=png&auto=webp&s=67a886290e89954b180e5ade637e1fbc361b155e

https://preview.redd.it/h4f50wev9wqd1.png?width=1160&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e721f7978a46d05be6a1b27aa1d991ebddf29d2

If you haven't read it yet, you can start digging into his Estimate of the Situation after three years of diligent work on these subs:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1dynw0z/a_recently_deleted_reddit_user_account_whom_some/

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQVn377KodONZ5cIY7-FS43Kvrh56MtYvBFaj4jk1BwjdS_vZzgieTkHhhGYPTYyJxY1bkPUAfFV0Kz/pub

This post by goes over those documents and some of the other statements made about the event:

The Alaskan UAP #20 WAS recovered and is currently being exploited

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fnrrq7/the_alaskan_uap_20_was_recovered_and_is_currently/

And this post by u/gramcc01:

Reminder: David Grusch was the NGA’s Senior Technical Advisor for UAP/Trans-Medium Issues, during the Chinese Spy Balloon + UAP shoot downs of a cylinder and an octagon. If Biden gave the orders to shoot them down, Grusch helped provide the intel.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fhrpet/reminder_david_grusch_was_the_ngas_senior/

As does this post by u/wrexxxxxxx:

Canadian Government releases data regarding Feb 2023 UAP incidentsCanadian Government releases data regarding Feb 2023 UAP incidents

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fmty65/canadian_government_releases_data_regarding_feb/

Here are the full 335 pages of data, thanks to and :

https://archive.org/details/a-2023-01298/mode/2up?view=theater

"What did the exploitation process reveal about UAP 20, described in mission logs as a metallic floating object that the public was told was not a balloon by General VanHerck of NORAD, who ran the shoot-down operation? "We're calling them objects for a reason."

by VolarRecords

Leave A Reply