I appreciate the opinions of all visitors to this community – Skeptics, Believers, and Skeptics of Skeptics.
I am curious to hear the Skeptic’s take on Karl Nell. Of all the people I have heard testimony from, I grind him to be, as they say, “credible beyond reproach”.
Considering this, let’s look at his assertions under a different light. Give me your logical refutation of his statements, or perhaps why he is not to be believed.
by Creative_Ad6495
7 Comments
Submission Statement:
This effort is being out forth to hopefully spur a discussion as to the credibility of Karl Nell.
Karl is an aerospace executive, senior military officer, and corporate strategist.
He seems to be someone “without a dog in the fight”, and yet, he is corroborating the testimonies of other experiencers. Particularly, he backs up the statements and experiences of people such as Ryan Graves, David Fravor, and other trained observers.
A skeptic you would have to take in the same way – at their word.
This person has positions to know sensitive and odd things. It is a huge reputational risk.
People of once great credibility have taken huge risks and gotten it very wrong, and at great cost. Consider Colin Powell and weapons of mass destruction.
Both readers, and presenters like Mr Nell, should have those examples fore in their minds when engaging this topic.
If the response they seek is softening public openness and curiosity for some other reason, they have already won.
If they plan to make this reality really real, we are not yet there.
Caveat emptor, and cross your fingers.
Where is the skeptic? They seem to be in agreement.
Evaluate his evidence, not his “credibility”. It’s possible to reserve judgement of facts until a clearer picture emerges. Half of what you see, none of what you hear.
Can you rule out with certainty that he is part of a disinformation campaign? Or that people like Grusch and Nell have been conned by other people who are part of a disinformation campaign?
My skeptical take on Karl Nell.
They found evidence of legacy programs, but were never read in. The entire campaign is to put pressure on the legacy program to volunteer to come forward. It is likely to have 0 actual whistleblowers. Mainly because if they actually blew the whistle, they would have to go public immediately, or they risk instant death.
Not refuting anything he’s claiming or saying I don’t believe him.
I will 100% remain a skeptic until physical proof is provided. It doesn’t even have to be proof of crafts or aliens, it can be proof that this program exists and I’d accept it.