Developing UFO tech may destroy humanity

In this section of the Lue interview with Jesse the following point is discussed: UFO technology may be too physically dangerous to reveal to the public. It's potentially such an extreme leap in capability that it would only take a single bad actor to destroy humanity, which is very likely considering our history of using new technology as weapons. How would such technology be made public in a way that benefits all without risking this? As Jesse mentions, "The specifics matter in this hypothetical," to which Lue responds that "there's a cascading series of questions that come after … the original conversation Hal Puthoff discussed with you … are we ready to tell the people the truth about UFOs."

The last quote relates to a SOL Foundation talk by Hal Puthoff where he describes working for a think tank in Washington DC with members of defense and intelligence where they were tasked with deciding whether the knowledge of crash retrievals could be brought out to the public. After a lot of discussing and tallying positive and negative outcomes multiple times, they always ended up in the negative, and recommended not to proceed with disclosure.

Hal continues to describe a twofold concern of the DIA in starting the AAWSAP:
1. Where are UAP coming from, their intent, etc. ?
2. Since we know other countries are studying this, what happens if they develop advanced technology?

They didn't seem so interested in the first question, but were concerned about the second question and tasked the program with investigating the following points:

"12 potential threat areas with regard to UAP:"

1. Lift
2. Propulsion
3. Control
4. Power generation
5. Space-time translation
6. Materials
7. Configuration structure
8. Signature reduction
9. Human effects
10. Human interface
11. Armament
12. Peripheral support issues

These points of interest in UAP illustrate the various vectors of danger to humanity if they were developed sufficiently. The hangup seemed to be the difficulty in developing the whole while maintaining a safe compartmentalization of each. The danger of solving the puzzle seems to be a counter-force to its development. They're so afraid of the tech getting into the wrong hands, that they develop it in such painstaking secrecy that it is a stunted endeavor.

I've heard it put various ways before, that we need to develop ourselves as humans before we develop this massive leap in technology, because we are too immature as a species to use the technology without inflicting tremendous harm to ourselves. If this technology were widely available it would only take the weakest link to do unknown amounts of damage. We're already on the precipice with the hydrogen bomb.

I just want to add that I'm not necessarily advocating for secrecy of the topic itself, but I do see how there may be very good reasoning for keeping strict control over technology that we as a species aren't capable of using safely. I think Lue put it well, that "there's a cascading series of questions that come after" the initial reveal, and they could lead to a dangerous situation.