I’ve heard this from many people now, calling them both grifters etc..
[Dave Grusch](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims#Background) was an actual Air Force intelligence officer who worked at National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), and was the representative of the NRO to the UAP Taskforce at the Pentagon.
He’s also not some guy who overheard some shit and decided to go public. He was hired specifically to investigate this. He interviewed 40 active high ranking intelligence officials, some with first hand experience with the NHI crafts and bodies, and went through the proper whistleblower process for 2+ years before he was allowed to go public with some of the information he has learned.
Meantime the goober in Mexico is a UFOlogist with a [long list of frauds](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16kkynl/list_of_hoaxes_promoted_by_jaime_maussan_which/) he has committed exploiting this community.
Putting these two anywhere near the same category is laughably inaccurate and disingenuous. I just wanted to point that out.
by TommyShelbyPFB
7 Comments
Grusch is the real deal. You can tell by how they’re all acting. The IG response says it all.
The Mexican aliens is a distraction, either paid to by a counter intelligence disinformation operation or an independent hoaxer that coincidentally did their work for them
Even if the people who fed Grusch this info were Hal Puthoff and Co.?
I mean Mexican alien dude at least has physical evidence.
OP is correct. But I’d also like to note that Grusch’s security clearances, while at a high level, we’re civilian level security clearances, which wouldn’t truly grant him access to hear any classified testimony from any “high ranking officials”
I will be downvoted for saying this but it doesn’t matter how credible someone is if they are making **extraordinary claims** and that too when they are not first hand witness themselves. Atleast Jaime gave some evidence which could be studied and is being studied now. Whatever his story is, it will reach an objective conclusion because he has constructed it from evidence. Once the evidence is debunked, the story goes off as well. (I doubt it will come as real though).
David Grusch glowes……
OP is right. The naysayer bots are making sure disclosure happens on the DoD’s timeline, but we can ignore them and help the good guys press ahead.